Printing Leaks Need Addressing — Cagle
March 2006Last month, we reported on proposed legislation in the Illinois State House of Representatives that could curtail the volume of direct mail pieces via a “Do Not Mail” list, patterned after the national “Do Not Call” registry. Proponents of the proposed law point out that officious-looking mailers—which help campaigns get a foot in the door (or a letter opener through the envelope)—are deceptive to the point that the elderly have complained about being exploited by them.
In a column that appeared in PI Weekly, our e-newsletter (sign up at www.piworld.com), I wrote that despite being sympathetic to the elderly, this is not a reason to put a halt to the most unintrusive one-to-one marketing tool at an advertiser’s disposal. There are other ways to remedy the problem of people getting manipulated by deceptive people, who (mind you) are unlikely to respect any law aimed at reducing deception, anyway. Mail is not to blame; it’s the old “kill the messenger” theory.
For one, how do we determine what is and isn’t a legitimate advertisement for a product or service? Are we criticizing the window dressing (literally) or the content? On the latter count, who is to decide whether, for example, term life insurance or a reverse mortgage is fiscally wise? A recent news report chronicled how the elderly have been duped into parlaying their life savings into retirement programs that do little other than bolster the coffers of those running the programs. But they’re legal. It’s not the vehicle that’s responsible for the new age of manipulation. Stopping direct mail will do little to remedy the problem. But it will do a lot to hurt a multi-billion-dollar industry.
In the end, cutting off direct mail, either at the state or federal level, would be a crippling blow to the printers that rely on this market as a bread-and-butter source. Printers have a great deal to worry about these days.
ELECTRONIC BLUES: Now that postal reform seems to be a fait accompli, there are other issues coming to the fore. One of those issues is the Securities and Exchange Commission’s proposed rule adoption that would allow the paper-based proxy materials process to be replaced with an electronic system of notification and balloting. Thus, annual reports and voting materials could be sent electronically rather than through snail mail as hard copies, which would be available by request.



