Printing Impressions

You will be automatically redirected to piworld in 20 seconds.
Skip this advertisement.

Advertisement
Advertisement
 
 
President, Print Oasis Print Buyers Conference

Connecting with Print Buyers

By Suzanne Morgan

About Suzanne

Suzanne Morgan is president of the annual Print Oasis Print Buyers Conference (www.printoasis.com) and Print Buyers Online.com, a free educational e-community for print buyers and their print suppliers (www.printbuyersonline.com). PBO has more than 11,000 members who buy $13 billion a year in printing. PBO conducts weekly research on buying trends and teaches organizations how to work more effectively with their print suppliers.

 

Equipment Brand: More Important Than You May Believe

2
 
Print Buyers Online.com recently asked our print buyer members, “How important is the brand of printing press/equipment in the production of your jobs?” Of the 72 print buyers who participated in the Quick Poll Survey:

• 6% said it was “very important”
• 44% said it was “somewhat important”
• 49% said it was “not important at all”
• 1% said “I don’t know”

I found these results very interesting as 50% of major print buyers now deem the brand of equipment to be important. This is a 20% increase from two years ago, when we last asked this question. The results of our newest poll support my belief that these days, print buyers are more interested in collaborating with their printers on workflow and equipment issues. Here is what some of them had to say:

“I know which presses are the best and have the highest quality—and I also know which ones are very old, problematic and to stay away from. Taking plant tours of shops lets me know what kind of equipment new vendors have and thus what types of jobs are best suited for their equipment.”

“The right equipment will print my job efficiently—and more quickly—and result in cost savings for my organization!”

“The right type of equipment can yield better pricing, faster throughput and increased quality.”

On the other hand, print buyers who said brand was not important also had valuable input:

“The professionals who run the equipment are more important to me than the brand of the machine itself. Some product names get thrown at me by prospective vendors who think the name of the press manufacturer will impress me so much that I will give them all my work. I have been witness to equipment that has not measured up to expectations. It is up to the management of the print house to have the best people, who are trained to get the most out of the equipment.”

“More important than brand is a particular printing press’ set of features, age, maintenance and integration into a plant’s job management systems. Most important is its operator.”

Both sides of the coin are valid—but what I found most interesting was suppliers had a much different take on the subject. When asked the same question, 69% of print suppliers believed equipment brand was not important to their customers. As one industry leader put it:

“I find most print buyers are less concerned with brands of equipment and more concerned with ‘capabilities’ when it comes to their interest in our equipment inventory. What the majority of new customers generally want to know is prepress, press size/capabilities, coating and turnaround time.”

What we’re finding is that print buyers starting to chime in on these issues. Let’s hear your comments on the subject: When it comes to print buyer interest in equipment brand, what have you found to be the case?

Industry Centers:

2

COMMENTS

Click here to leave a comment...
Comment *
Most Recent Comments:
Terry Duffy - Posted on April 21, 2008
On plant tours equipment brands tell a story about the printer's history and decision making process. If they have seven presses on the floor from five different manufacturers chances are good that different management groups bought that equipment to fit the needs of that particular time in their development. A consistency in brands (and configuration) shows consistency in management philosophy and direction.
William W. West IV - Posted on April 07, 2008
If I were a customer I would be more concerned with the printer's ability to produce a high quality product rather than the name on the machine that is producing it.

The printer should view a plant visit by the customer as a combination fact finding mission to determine the printer's ability to produce quality product as well as to the production process in action.
Click here to view archived comments...
Archived Comments:
Terry Duffy - Posted on April 21, 2008
On plant tours equipment brands tell a story about the printer's history and decision making process. If they have seven presses on the floor from five different manufacturers chances are good that different management groups bought that equipment to fit the needs of that particular time in their development. A consistency in brands (and configuration) shows consistency in management philosophy and direction.
William W. West IV - Posted on April 07, 2008
If I were a customer I would be more concerned with the printer's ability to produce a high quality product rather than the name on the machine that is producing it.

The printer should view a plant visit by the customer as a combination fact finding mission to determine the printer's ability to produce quality product as well as to the production process in action.