Open Enrollment | Subscribe to Printing Impressions HERE
Connect
Follow us on
Advertisement
 

Postal Service Denied Rate Increase

October 2010

WASHINGTON, DC—In a move that was as surprising as it was welcomed by the printing and mailing communities, the Postal Regulatory Commission (PRC) denied the U.S. Postal Service's (USPS) request for an average 5.6 percent rate increase. The commission unanimously found that the Postal Service failed to justify rate increases in excess of its statutory Consumer Price Index (CPI) price cap.

"The commission finds that the Postal Service has shown the recent recession to be an exigent circumstance, but it has failed both to quantify the impact of the recession on its finances and to show how its rate request relates to the resulting loss of mail volume; therefore, we unanimously deny its exigent rate request," said PRC Chairman Ruth Goldway.

Michael Makin, president and CEO of Printing Industries of America, applauded the PRC decision, stating that it was "right on the policy, right on the law and, most importantly, right for business. Tens of thousands of jobs in the printing industry and throughout the mailing supply chain have been saved by this decision," he added. "As printers continue to struggle with economic and regulatory uncertainty, the PRC decision is one bright spot as the industry seeks growth opportunities in the mailing and fulfillment market."

The law requires the Postal Service to demonstrate that any exigent rate adjustments are due to the identified exceptional circumstances. This prevents a bona fide extraordinary or exceptional circumstance from being used as a general rate increase mechanism that would circumvent the price cap system.

While the PRC recognized the USPS' recent volume losses and multibillion-dollar shortfalls, the commission analysis found that the Postal Service's cash flow problem "is not a result of the recession and would have occurred whether or not the recession took place."

The Postal Service achieved more than $6 billion in cost reductions in 2009. PI


 

COMMENTS

Click here to leave a comment...
Comment *
Most Recent Comments: