OMB Printing Proposal Is Controversial
WASHINGTON, DC—The Bush Administration’s proposal to open up the printing needs of the executive branch to competitive bidding is garnering both praise and criticism.
Outgoing Public Printer Michael DiMario claims, in a letter to the Joint Committee on Printing, that the changes would hurt small printers who depend on Government Printing Office (GPO) work. In contrast, Ben Cooper, Printing Industries of America’s executive vice president for public policy, believes that the proposal would open up new contract avenues for all printers.
Currently, the GPO outsources approximately 75 percent of all of its work through its Printing Procurement Program, which is made up of more than 16,000 printers or nearly 40 percent of the industry. (See page 16 for Top 50 GPO Printers list.) The list includes printers from every state in the nation and more than 70 percent of those printers are small businesses. The jobs that the GPO retains in-house is work that is time-sensitive or cannot be procured for security reasons.
At present, the GPO serves as a one-stop shopping site for approximately 6,300 federal departments, bureaus, offices, agencies and other entities. “Under the new system, only printers who can afford to hire specialized government sales staffs to ferret out printing opportunities from these federal agencies or who have unique relationships with the agencies would now be able to win jobs,” claims DiMario.
Cooper disagrees. “The GPO’s procurement system is not a perfect system and it has some serious problems. The GPO’s customer is the executive branch and not everyone is uniformly satisfied with the GPO’s work. There are a number of dissatisfied agencies and, over the years, they’ve gained waivers to go outside of the GPO. So, no, the GPO does not have all of the government work,” he says.
One alternate proposal currently being considered would be to set up a new bidding system that would use the FedBizOpps.gov Website.