U.S. Postal Service: Another Looming Crisis

Lisbeth Lyons.

Quad/Graphics’ Joe Schick.

Jim Andersen of IWCO Direct.

It’s hard not to feel sorry for Patrick Donahoe. The Postmaster General of the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) had barely been on the job for two months when, in early March, he found himself addressing a subcommittee of the House of Representatives’ Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. At issue: The USPS’ ability to function as an ongoing concern.

It is one of many trials for Donahoe. Clearly, the honeymoon phase is over for the new guy. On Donahoe’s current fight card:

• He must battle the perception that the USPS is seeking a bailout (some politicians are even under the false impression that Mr. ZIP is on the government dole; it receives no operative tax dollars).

• He is trying to coerce Congress to refund $75 billion in overpayments to the Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS) and $7 billion in over-funding to the Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS). Monocles everywhere will come crashing to the ground upon learning that the government is hesitant to refund the money.

• Donahoe must also fend off the perception that the Postal Service is over-bloated with excess costs, capacity and dead weight. That says nothing about the public perception that the mail is an archaic vehicle for the transmission of information.

• And most galling to those who sympathize with the USPS is the requirement to prefund retiree health benefits (RHB) to the tune of $5.5 billion per year, which they feel is as unfair as it is unprecedented, for no other entity, public or private, carries this burden. USPS also pays $2.2 billion per year for current retiree health benefits. The prefunding was borne out of the 2006 Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act (PAEA), which was intended to provide a modern business plan.

If anything, PAEA has turned out to be a recipe for disaster. In each of the four years prior to the law taking effect, the USPS reaped a net income. In his testimony, Donahoe noted that in fiscal 2007 and 2008, USPS would have showed positive cash flow with profits of $3.3 billion and $2.8 billion, respectively. Instead, the prepayment left it with losses of $5.1 billion and $2.8 billion in those respective years.

Related Content
  • http://J.Jameson J. Jameson

    Sirs, This is one of the most accurate depictions of the alleged postal crisis that I have read. The “postal crisis” in it’s entirety was created by Congress when it passed the PAEA in 2006. It is easy to bankrupt ANY company when you raise their bills to the point at which they cannot pay them.
    Congress, courtesy of Susan Collins of Maine, has purposely destroyed postal finances for reasons that no one will answer to. Given that the PAEA was an accidental mistake, why was it not repealed immediately, particularly in the face of the recession? Why has the Congress NOT refunded the $60 or so billion that the Treasury has been overcharging the Post Office for the past forty years? Why do some members of Congress keep calling the return of these funds a “bailout” when they know full well that it is not. In some circles that would be called lying.

    And the biggest question of all, why has it taken the media so long to tell the truth concerning why the Post Office is in financial trouble, when the facts have always been there?