Dickeson–Looking for Some Changes

Start with this situation analysis: We can’t use monthly financial statements to support operating decisions. There are too many unrealistic assumptions and they’re not timely. We’re not optimizing liquidity—not turning over inventories and account receivables rapidly enough. Our production reporting is all messed up with non-chargeable labor or machine hours and spurious capacity assumptions.

Despite knowing the multitude of variables of printing inputs, we don’t acknowledge the application of chaos theory to printing. We set prices for commercial jobs by marking up mythical cost estimates knowing that it is nonsense. We install computer systems that provide stacks of data we either don’t use or misuse—for example, scheduling and estimating systems that must be ignored. We invest in high-speed presses and computer-to-plate technology, neither of which will cost-justify. Why?

Even though all this is true, we survive. But we could do much better if we made good use of the data we can now command. It’s the Information Age. Peter Drucker, our foremost business guru, tells us our main task is to make our knowledge workers efficient and accountable. How do we do this?

Technology hasn’t done it for us thus far and isn’t about to do it, unless we demand it. The buck has stopped in our chair. Time to begin thinking—speculating—about what we, and our knowledge workers, can really use as support for operating decisions.

Tell a Good Story
As humans, we operate best if the information comes to us in story form. That’s a given. How do we get information as a story? Television programs, movies, newspapers, magazines and books give us information as stories. Writers, editors, directors, producers and publishers make stories for us that we process into knowledge. Is it too much for us to ask the computer system designers to shift into story publishing attitudes—to become story tellers?

Related Content
Comments